Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Luck

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. JYolkowski // talk 23:00, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Tony Luck

No sources or google hits for any of the relevant terms, probable hoax. --fvw* 05:34, August 23, 2005 (UTC)

• Comment: He is the leader of a registered political party, so says Elections BC. He did not run as a candidate in any election (as far as I know), as such I remain neutral but interested in the outcome. -maclean25 06:47, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Only 99 Google hits for the party, most of which point to the party site which only displays a message saying that the site is not available. Searching on "Tony Luck" has around 9k hits, but non of the first few pages seem relevant. --GraemeL ^(talk) 11:59, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete already mentioned on the Emerged Democracy Party of British Columbia, which is pretty brief. I would paste the end of the sentence there but for slight diff. of naming I'm unsure of. Alf 12:16, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Emerged Democracy Party of British Columbia, since there's no further material here to be merged. Not a candidate, no indication so far that his party leadership has led to mainstream media coverage beyond "minor party's head said what party heads always say." Barno 18:47, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand Tony Luck is a registered political party leader in British Columbia, and Wikipedia precedent allows party leaders to have separate bio pages (even in the case of small parties). CJCurrie 00:45, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep This would set a bad precedent, in most jurisdictions in Canada takes a lot of effort to get and keep a political party registered in law. --Cloveious 01:48, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per CJCurrie and Cloveious. I have wikified the article. Ground Zero | t 16:25, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per the above, it may be a small, weak article at this point but the precedent is party leaders are article worthy. - Jord 01:08, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.