Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommy Kaira

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 09:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tommy Kaira

Tommy Kaira (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

The article was nominated for speedy deletion under G11 (spam), but doesn't qualify. A7 (non-notability) doesn't apply either, because there is an assertion of notability. I'm moving this to AfD instead. No opinion. Aecis ^{Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984.} 18:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Comment: Sorry if it is rubbish i just thought it should be created because it was the only read link on GT car lists so i thought it was worth creating, but everyones entitled to their opinions I understand, I dont mind if it gets deleted I just thought it was a good idea thats all...DINOMAN 18:32, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

• Keep About 47,000 GHits; not a vast number, but clearly the Company possesses some notability.--Anthony.bradbury 19:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Looks notable to me, despite the article being a sentence. A brief web browse shows it could easily satisfy WP:CORP. CiaranG 19:29, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and cleanup! per CiaranG FirefoxMan 00:42, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - company exists and is notable, although this article is presently a sub-stub (I'm going to see what I can do about that). Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 02:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Kjbd 06:21, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and Expand per comments above. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 01:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • I've expanded a little, though others are certainly welcome to assist. I'm not a huge car fan. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 04:42, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.