Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toll House
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was procedural speedy keep. ;-) Can't sleep, clown will eat me 10:45, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Toll House
A consensus was reached at DRV to overturn the speedy deletion of this article [1]. This is a procedural nomination so I abstain. Thryduulf 15:58, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep, very well known brand. --badlydrawnjeff talk 16:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep this article could use expansion, but it is notable as the first cookies of its type. Or so I recall from the History Channel. Mister.Manticore 16:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per above. Postdlf 16:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep, well-known brand and historically significant as first chocolate-chip cookie. NawlinWiki 17:09, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Notoriously well-known brand name, oft referred in almost generic sense. Commonly referred to in popular culture as well. Agent 86 19:49, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - per above - AfDs are getting ridiculous! PT (s-s-s-s) 20:12, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep. Meets the requirements for product notability. Original speedy was nonsense.Cynical 22:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, what a joke that we even have to debate this. RFerreira 00:57, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, WP:SNOW applies. Alba 03:36, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- speedy keep this please toll house is a major brand erasing makes no sense at all Yuckfoo 07:39, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.