Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titan Rain

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was that the nomination was withdrawn by the nominator. Rschen7754 21:50, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Titan Rain

Information cannot be verified. I can't check the Time article since my browser is dumb but other edits by this user have been questionable. Rschen7754 00:09, September 1, 2005 (UTC)

• Strong Keep This is valid topic but needs to be expanded past a simple definition DV8 2XL 00:27, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep the external link works for me, and a quick google returns thousands of hits. --TheMidnighters 01:31, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep as per DV8 2XL. --Apyule 05:50, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. The TIME article is all about this. Title is "The Invasion of the Chinese Cyberspies (And the Man Who Tried to Stop Them); An exclusive look at how the hackers called TITAN RAIN are stealing U.S. secrets". --Fastfission 19:32, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per above. -- DS1953 00:47, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep time after time. —RaD Man (talk) 07:10, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
• Okay... I made a huge mistake. How do I get rid of the VFD? --Rschen7754 05:38, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
• I'd like to know what edits I have made that are 'questionable'? --Cm205
  • Someone else (an IP address) edited this page that made some other questionable edits... that is why this page was VFDed. My apologies. --Rschen7754 21:44, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.