Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time to mull

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:06, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Time to mull

You may want a little while to consider this :-) ... Seriously, while it has respectable Googling numbers Time to mull, most occurrences are in the middle of sentences, not as a phrase. For me, in fact, this was the first time I heard it. A neophrase? Daniel Case 06:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete for reasons given, and Wikipedia is not a slang guide. Gazpacho 06:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Erechtheus 06:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Neologism. (|-- UlTiMuS 06:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Gwernol 07:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. WP:NOT. Thε Halo ^Θ 10:35, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. JIP | Talk 11:24, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• DeleteNon-notable neologism.--Anthony.bradbury 11:55, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not more neologism-cruft... Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 12:05, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete the phrase as I know it is "time to mull things over" or "time to think things over". Does not belong in the list of idioms, as the meaning is obvious. For amusement value it could be redirected to Contemplation LinaMishima 12:52, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a neologism. I'd say redirect, but this is an implausible search term. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 06:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.