Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Texas Hot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 00:05, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Texas Hot

Might be a local landmark for all I know, but it doesn't seem to be notable from what I can gather. (John Rigas was born in the appartment over.) Eivind 00:03, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

• Looks like it fails WP:CORP. Delete —Cuiviénen, 00:05, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete copyvio: [1]. Would recommend CSD A8, but over 48 h since creation -- Samir (the scope) 00:43, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Copyvio. -- Arnzy | Talk 01:09, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, despite remarkable sauce --Obli (Talk)^? 01:12, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --Khoikhoi 01:53, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn restaurant. dbtfz^talk 02:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Doesn't meet Wikipedia:Notability. —Eternal Equinox | talk 02:49, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Nn and isn't up to a v. good writing standard either. If it were notable I'd rewrite it but it isn't so I won't. Bayberrylane 02:58, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per everybody else. --AaronS 19:59, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn restaurant. --Terence Ong 03:02, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. AmiDaniel 03:44, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Don't feel dumber for having read it, but still nn restaurant. Deizio 03:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per everything above. mhunter 04:34, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Interesting Destination. --Masssiveego 05:43, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable building (as far as the article leads me to believe) and copyvio. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Massiveego. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 14:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn. Bucketsofg 15:14, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as copyvio. --Cymsdale 15:15, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Copyvio from where? Grandmasterka 17:30, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

The link in Samir's comment. --Cymsdale 18:28, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete NN. --AaronS 20:00, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, copyvio as above. Don't protect the article space; someone might come along and write a decent article. -ikkyu2 (talk) 20:10, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, ditto the above. Possibly good topic. ProhibitOnions 20:51, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• DELETE not notable Newyorktimescrossword 09:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per everything above. Jonas Silk 18:07, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as copyvio. Perhaps noteable enough to mention in John Rigas?

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.