Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sith Conspiracy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was redirect to Sith. -- ( drini's vandalproof page ☎ ) 05:56, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] The Sith Conspiracy
Delete. Already covered, and in more detail, elsewhere. --Maru (talk) Contribs 23:31, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Made redundant by various other Star Wars articles. Saberwyn 05:22, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
- I'll support a redirect, but delete still is my first option. Saberwyn 08:55, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
Keep, unless an appropriate redirect is found. Kappa 08:04, 18 November 2005 (UTC)- The topic is duplicated in more detail than the nominated article at Sith#History of the Sith Order, in particular the section from Revenge of the Sith onwards. However, relevant information concerning the major aspects of the 'Sith Conspiracy' is covered in greater detail at Great Jedi Purge, Order 66 and in lesser detail at Invasion of Naboo, Confederacy of Independent Systems, Galactic Republic (Star Wars)#The End of the Republic and the plot summaries at Prequel trilogy (Star Wars) and each prequel movie's article. That's just what I've found with a few minutes. I'd suggest a redirect to Sith (it's a pity you can't redirect to specific sections), but take your pick, my friend. Saberwyn 08:28, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete or maybe redirect per above if people really can't bring themselves to nuke it. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 14:39, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete with extreme prejudice. Way too many articles on little corners of fictional worlds (that would be deleted if they were in the "real world", for lack of noteriety). Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 18:24, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.