Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Scatologists (band)

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 ^talk 22:07, August 2, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] The Scatologists (band)

NN, D. ComCat 22:36, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. 66 Google hits. And what are "toasting vocals"? --Idont Havaname 23:06, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Toasting vocals are sort of like reggae vocals or rapping. --FuriousFreddy 19:09, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn band vanity. --Etacar11 00:06, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn band with one album from a minor indie label. Does not meet WP:MUSIC -Harmil 00:26, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep bands with albums, even if they are on labels not sufficiently major enough to excite some. Grace Note 04:22, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
  • If we had articles on every band with an album, there would be chaos. That is why we have the WP:MUSIC notability guidelines. --FuriousFreddy 19:09, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non notable band vanity. JamesBurns 08:43, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:MUSIC. Dcarrano 16:09, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Dcarrano. Friday 19:16, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. What Dcarrano said. --FuriousFreddy 19:09, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep this band was successful (opened a concert for the Toasters), well-known regionally (even if Delaware is a small market), and had hundreds of very loyal followers. This is not vanity -- it's history. Oh, and if you don't know what Jamaican toasting is, you should look it up on Wikipedia first. Thekohser 05:22, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.