Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Infamous (webcomic)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete CSD G4 - "thou shalt not suffer a blatant repost to live". No salting though, creator has been advised to write something at Comixpedia instead. Kimchi.sg 15:50, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Infamous (webcomic)

This article was previous deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Infamous, the reasons for deletion remain the same, but as only 3 people voted at that last one, more input here would be nice. This is a non notable webcomic, found here hosted on Comic Genesis, a free webhost like geocities and Tripod. It is not mentioned on Comic Genesis' Alexa report. Googling the phrase doesn't return much either, using various different search strings I still can't find a single decent external source reporting on the subject of the article. - Hahnchen 01:45, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable. Recreation of deleted material. --Ezeu 02:02, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. G4 candidate. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 02:25, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per original afd. Arker 07:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and yes, it could be speedied as G4 since it is all but identical (I checked) but there's no pressing reason to deny it its day in the sun since as pointed out above there were very few contributors to the last AfD. Mind you, the creator was an editor on the deleted article and knows full well it was deleted... Just zis Guy you know? 11:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong and speedy delete. See the author's comment on the article talk page: he knew perfectly well that recreating a deleted article was wrong, and did so "to fill my curiosity and get a little advertising in". This is not acceptable, and I rather think that the fact that the article creator admits it was created for advertising purposes is a pressing reason to deny it its day in the sun. — Haeleth Talk 13:23, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per G4 and WP:SALT.--Isotope23 14:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per Haeleth. Dionyseus 15:09, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.