Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fanimatrix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Kotepho 00:36, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Fanimatrix

ATTENTION! If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a ballot, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting heads. You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing! Note: Comments made by suspected single purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username|UTC timestamp [optional]}}

• Delete. more fancruft. — Milkandwookiees ^(T | C) 16:00, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I'm not sure how this is fan cruft. This seems like a notable enough film. The article is good as well. This film is listed in the IMDb joshbuddy^talk 16:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. The film exists and is popular. It is listed in the IMDB. It Googles well. Why would anyone want to delete it? wikipediatrix 16:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep per this[1]. I am worried about this user, it appears s/he is placing alot of bad faith noms on anything that is internet related. Yanksox 16:19, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I highly recomend that everyone looks over this user's contribs[2]. Yanksox 16:20, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Notability is asserted and sourced. Kafziel 16:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Per above. The Wookieepedian 16:41, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep - Brand new user Milkandwookiees has suddenly nominated an awful lot of articles for deletion with very flimsy reasoning. Possible WP:POINT? TheRealFennShysa 16:42, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Per original nomination. — WCityMike (talk • contribs) 20:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Seems quite notable. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 20:27, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Why delete one entry regarding a notable fan film that was a legitimate phenomenon (so claims the article with evidence presented) and not delete several other so-called fancruft articles regarding numerous Star Wars fan films on here such as Broken Allegiance and Darth Vader's Psychic Hotline and Troops? Keep them all or remove them all, rather than give preferential treatment to articles that may have personal user interest (judging by user's moniker) — Zardoz | 02:15, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. Voice of Treason 14:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 15:31, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above discussion. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 15:31, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.