Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dell-Vikings

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP and move to Del-Vikings. 9k+m including redirects, 1k, 1d(before rewrite). -Splash 01:10, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] The Dell-Vikings

non-notable entry, may be related to 1950s band The Del-Vikings, which does not have an entry of any kind. --Mitsukai 4 July 2005 01:45 (UTC)Redirect to The Del-Vikings--Mitsukai 4 July 2005 15:58 (UTC)

• Delete; although The Del-Vikings would be deserving of their own entry, nothing here seems salvageable. Dcarrano July 4, 2005 02:05 (UTC) After rewrite, redirect to The Del-Vikings. Dcarrano July 4, 2005 07:58 (UTC)
• Delete as it is; if more info is provided, move to The Del-Vikings. Jaxl 4 July 2005 02:13 (UTC) Rewrite and redirect to The Del-Vikings. Jaxl 4 July 2005 13:44 (UTC)
• Delete non notable. JamesBurns 4 July 2005 02:21 (UTC)
• Keep and rewrite completely. The Dell-Vikings and the Del-Vikings started as the same group but their name was spelled differently depending on what record label they recorded for. (An explanation can be found at Allmusic.) --Metropolitan90 July 4, 2005 04:49 (UTC)
  • It should be a redirect to The Del-Vikings, with an explanation. The single-L-with-hypen variation of the name is what they are best known as, and should be the paramount name out of the three they used.--Mitsukai 4 July 2005 04:58 (UTC)
• Keep and rewrite (I'll do this myself if I find some time). It's a less common spelling of their name. See [1]. Pburka 4 July 2005 04:57 (UTC)
  • I've just done a rewrite; however, any other changes are welcome, and it doesn't matter to me which spelling is the main one and which is redirected. --Metropolitan90 July 4, 2005 05:41 (UTC)
• Keep article with possible move to The Del-Vikings. Notable doowop band which had several hits thereby meeting WikiMusic Project criteria. Capitalistroadster 4 July 2005 07:12 (UTC)
• Keep and Move as per above. --Alex12 3 4 July 2005 07:38 (UTC)
• keep and move like said above Spearhead 4 July 2005 09:45 (UTC)
• Keep and move, as per above. Grutness...wha? 4 July 2005 10:11 (UTC)
• Keep & Move. As above. Cnwb 5 July 2005 01:32 (UTC)
• Keep & Move. Interesting little piece of music history. — Dan Johnson ^T_C July 6, 2005 16:55 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.