Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Blind King

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:31, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Blind King

This entry fails the criteria of WP:BAND; a failed speedy candidate. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 21:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, although I'd reconsider if a discography was posted that showed it met the band criteria. Article alludes to their recording, but a discography is essential, in my book. Akradecki 22:03, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Changed my recommendation after above suggestion was carried out and notability was established by inclusion of discography and independent reviews in article, per note on discussion page for this project and a further review of the article. Akradecki 16:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 14:00, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete The discography doesn't meet WP:BAND. Their CDs are self-produced, latterly under a faux brand. Eusebeus 14:49, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. - IceCreamAntisocial 19:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I still don't think there's anything that points to passage of WP:MUSIC. And why the hell are the two external links in the reviews section a review, and then a recopying of that review? -- Kicking222 22:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.Ramsquire 23:32, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.