Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheBetween
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy Delete (by Geogre) Redwolf24 23:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] TheBetween
no assertion of meeting WP:MUSIC. Delete Friday 01:23, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
- Weak delete. Thousands of Google hits, but they are mostly misspellings (i.e. missed-out spaces). No presence on allmusic.com either with or without a space. Their latest recording only produced 150 copies and appears to be self-sold (you pay by Paypal), so they don't meet that bit of WP:MUSIC. However, they have a busy-looking schedule on their website [1], but all those are within Ontario. WP:MUSIC wants a national tour. However, their upcoming performances include Turkey. No detail is given, so it is not possible to tell if this is just a performance in a friend's bar out there. -Splash 01:51, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete no Allmusic page, no mention of releases or even a label. --TheMidnighters 04:58, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. the wub "?/!" 13:08, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy deleted by me. Not a sentence = not an article. The band may or may not become worthy soon, but deletion is not an assessment of the value of the subject, just of the article. At present, the band is unsigned, so there wasn't really a need to list on RfE, but the article was a phrase without a verb. That's criterion #1, inter al. Geogre 15:30, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
- Wrong. If the article is bad, then it should be fixed; deletion is ENTIRELY a judgment on the worthiness of the subject to have an article rather than the worth of the article itself as it exists at that time. Kurt Weber 18:29, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
- And you get this from where? Geogre 19:04, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
- WP:DP Kurt Weber 14:44, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
- And you get this from where? Geogre 19:04, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
- Wrong. If the article is bad, then it should be fixed; deletion is ENTIRELY a judgment on the worthiness of the subject to have an article rather than the worth of the article itself as it exists at that time. Kurt Weber 18:29, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
