Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That Girl Emily (blog)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 19:31, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] That Girl Emily (blog)
Viral marketing has no place on wikipedia. Violates WP:SPAM --DarkAudit 16:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Additional from MrSassyPants via IRC: if they can make the article into something useful instead of a summary of the blog and some semi-useful links, keep it. Its just that in its present form the article is 100% pure shit. --DarkAudit 16:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete: Viral marketing ploy, just a few weeks old. If it must be kept, redirect to Court TV, which conducted the viral marketing campaign. --Durin 16:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - it's a viral marketing ploy that may not even be notable, ever. Why even bother merging to Court TV? If it turns out to be a notable campaign in any way that becomes solidly identified with the Court TV, then it can be added. -- Whpq 17:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. While interesting, there's nothing especially notable about this viral marketing campaign. --Alan Au 17:52, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Do not delete. I realize as the author of the article, I must be seen as biased, but it seems to me that the article certainly fits in what is intended to be a highly-inclusive repository of information such as Wikipedia. I feel it serves quite well as a notable example of viral marketing, and is a useful example to those who are researching that particular subject. --Cyningaenglisc 01:49, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.