Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tecno DJS
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 16:04, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Tecno DJS
Does not appear to meet WP:MUSIC guidelines. Band vanity. Joyous (talk) 18:46, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep May not even have a label, yet, I have listened to their album, and it sounds rather good. They may have an actual shot at a label. It can be noted that almost nobody has heard of them, yet, I have a good feeling about this band.Legendary 18:51, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- Still nn. Sorry. ♥purplefeltangel (talk) ♥ (contribs) 18:56, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- Well, I had guessed that this would be deleted near instantly. Though, I feel that any band that is willing to use a large amount of their time and work to keep working and making music for almost no one is a very good, worthy band. I would have given up if I had no fans, but they keep working. A good notability for some people so young. Legendary 19:04, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- They may be good and worthy, but unfortunately they aren't yet notable enough for Wikipedia. Perhaps someday all that hard work will pay off. By the way, if you thought it would be deleted, why did you create it? Common sense is always a good idea. ♥purplefeltangel (talk) ♥ (contribs) 19:11, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- Well, I had guessed that this would be deleted near instantly. Though, I feel that any band that is willing to use a large amount of their time and work to keep working and making music for almost no one is a very good, worthy band. I would have given up if I had no fans, but they keep working. A good notability for some people so young. Legendary 19:04, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- Well, yeah, I guess. Sometimes, I don't think. But, please atleast become on of their members people, or find some money to donate. Morgan needs his money to expand his band's popularity and buy more software. Well, that's what he said.Legendarydairy 19:23, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- Still nn. Sorry. ♥purplefeltangel (talk) ♥ (contribs) 18:56, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete bandity ♥purplefeltangel (talk) ♥ (contribs) 18:56, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete bandity, even if music is slightly better than most of the stuff that is pushed here Ryan Norton T | @ | C 19:00, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as a not notable band. I admit that I didn't bother listening to their music before casting my vote, so my opinion on whether or not it's any good must be withheld. Lord Bob 23:29, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Article even admits they are non notable! Cnwb 01:31, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
