Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TechCrunch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Deathphoenix ʕ 15:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] TechCrunch

Article fails to do much other than link to a blog. Artw 18:38, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Borderline A3 speedy. Powers 18:47, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep this is the 17th biggest blog in the world, and has a reasonable Alexa rank (~1000) http://www.alexa.com/data/details/main?q=&url=techcrunch.com . Also, it has nearly 80,000 readers to it's RSS feed (as you can see in the image on their blog) Computerjoe's talk 20:03, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment added a few extra sentences Computerjoe's talk 20:13, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, pure advertisement. Also WP is not a web directory. Tychocat 22:11, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and Expand per Computerjoe. --Pboyd04 00:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep This is a blog worthy of an entry. --Gary King 07:27, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep TechCrunch is a perfect example of a viral business blog that addresses the market demand for strategic insight on Web 2.0 companies, business models, and overall utility. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.126.225.42 (talk • contribs).
• Keep Needs much expansion though. TechCrunch is seen by some observers as being the authority on new Web 2.0 web sites. NRTurner 22:36 02 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.