Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Ware

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, single purposed accounts noted. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 20:22, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Note: The AFD notice was on the Taylor Ware article but the nominator didn't create this page. It was another user that created this page.

[edit] Taylor Ware

• Keep - Taylor is a finalist on America's Got Talent. If Bianca Ryan, Celtic Spring (other finalists on the show) get to stay and not be brought up for deletion, then why not Taylor? 6:02 8 August 2006 Fanficgurl (UTC)
• Keep - Reality show contestants are not notable unless they go on to do something notable on their own.She has. Taylor's preformed at the world famous Grand Ole Opry with Riders In The Sky.Isn't just being on the show doing something notable?She made it by herself.No one just said well your a cute little girl you made it.She's been on TV on a hit show .Finalist.For a millon bucks.I agree with everyonelse about why this article should be kept."Reality show contestants are not notable unless they go on to do something notable on their own"would have to then apply for all AGT aticles for finalists to be deleted.Which should not happen just because you don't like Taylor Ware. we7888
• Keep - I agree with the above comment. Furthermore, what is the rationale for deleting this artice? What is wrong with it, or why is it inappropriate? If the article has been nominated for deletion simply because someone doesn't like Taylor Ware or doesn't like the creator of the article (which happens to be me), that's a lame excuse. Have the courage to tell us why the article should be deleted. If the article violates any of Wikipedia's policies or standards, please state what they are so that they can be corrected if possible. Otherwise, if this article deserves deletion, I think it will be followed by a flood of nominations for other articles to be deleted, articles that need to be on Wikipedia. By the way, I have no personal connection with Taylor. I simply wrote the article because I thought it was needed. I've contributed to articles about other AGT finalists and to other articles in general. I haven't written anything negative about any of them. I did remove a few non-NPOV comments, and if anyone sees any non-NPOV comments in Taylor Ware's article, by all means modify them. I do suspect that my removal of non-NPOV material from other contestants' articles is what prompted someone to nominate the Taylor Ware article for deletion. If that's true, my only response is: grow up. Ward3001 23:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. TheKillerAngel 19:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Remove-No offense, but this article doesn't have enough information about her. If the person who wrote this wants to keep it, they should put a bit more info. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.165.57.43 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:51, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep If you're a finalist on a popular reality show like AGT, that makes you notable enough to me. Kirjtc2 12:54, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - To the person who said the article doesn't have enough information: That's why it's called a "stub" until more information can be obtained. AGT finalists are not allowed to communicate with the media (including Wikipedia or its contributors) until the competition is complete. The info in the article is the main info that is publicly available. To my knowledge there are no photos of her available that are not copyrighted. More information will certainly be added as it becomes available. Until then, the "not enough information" argument isn't sufficient grounds for deletion. Ward3001 18:12, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - Well I kind of agree with the person who says this aritcle doesn't have enough information, but I think it should stay here. Over time, as she gets more popular, more information will be added. If Wikipedia gives this article a chance, this could be a good article. I also agree with the above comment. Since she is under the age of majority, there is limited information that we can post online. I think this article deserves a chance. theresa123123123 23:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• KeepShe is a finalists on a nationally televised program. Other finalists have articles so I don't see why she can't as well. --Edgelord 05:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. --badlydrawnjeff talk 10:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

• Comment-Why does it look like the reason for deletion was a keep vote? Look at the first edit of the page. It seems as though the nominater didn't even want to delete it, just to say they wanted to keep it. TeckWiz^TalkContribs_{# of Edits} 01:37, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Reality show contestants are not notable unless they go on to do something notable on their own. Nothing listed in the article meets WP:MUSIC, which is the standard I think she should be held to. --Aguerriero (talk) 04:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable person, no reason to delete article. --Wizardman 23:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. The article may be short, but I don't see anything wrong with it. --ClonedPickle 11:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I don't see a problem with this article. If Canadian Idol and American Idol contestants have articles why not America's Got Talent contestants? FellowWikipedian 02:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.