Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taresthesia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. ... very thin consensus and I was tempted to relist to seek further consensus but this is a neoproto and it's one sentence long, and no evidence of any use by anyone anywhere... Delete. --++Lar: t/c 00:42, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Taresthesia

If this were a real scientific term, it would have hits on Google Scholar or Medline, or *anywhere* other than a couple blog factoid sections. Non-notable unverifiable neoprotologism. — Adrian Lamo ·· 18:55, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete NN/hoax term —Mets501^talk 19:10, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No references to this term available from Dictionary.com or Google.co.uk. Plenty of mentions in Myspace but all are unsupported by citations of sources.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  19:56, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.