Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanya Spearritt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect. Proto||type 09:44, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tanya_Spearritt

Contains inaccurate and unverifiable information (WP:V). There is no real need for this page to exist as she isn't notable enough (WP:BIO). Stokesay34 10:22, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. The article has currently been blanked with the AFD notice, the previous revision was a redirect to Hannah Spearritt, and the previous two revisions were blanked. Version with actual content. I'm not sure, however, that she's notable. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 10:56, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep, no valid reason for deletion provided. Monicasdude 15:23, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
  • I see two: "unverifiable" and "isn't notable enough". Stifle 23:54, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Non-noteble person, unsourced and unverified KimmyCat 17:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect to Hannah Spearritt. Every Google hit I got on her was in the context of her famose sister. Seano1 22:04, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect per Seano1. Established consensus is that nn relatives of notable people go in the article of the notable person. Stifle 23:54, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• I really can't see any good reason to keep this. We can verify she exists, but not that she's important... Shimgray | talk | 17:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect per Stifle FloNight ^talk 16:42, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.