Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TBN Tower
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete all. Chick Bowen 03:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] TBN Tower
- TBN Tower (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- South Dakota Public Broadcasting Tower Pierpont (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Allur/Kansas City Tower (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Smith TV Tower (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- WTTO-TV Tower Birmingham (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Tri State Christian TV Tower (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Bluewater Broadcasting Tower Grady (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Baptist Bible College Tower (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- LIN TV Tower (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Clear Channel Broadcasting Tower Opelika (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
As cleanup following successful batch deletion of unremarkable masts, I'm nominating a whole bunch of US radio and TV towers that are no more than that 325 meters tall. Towers below 400m are relatively common in the USA, and none of the towers that I am nominating are notable in any way whatsoever, as far as I can tell. Stubs every one of them, none have any substantial additional information other than their name, location and height. Ohconfucius 04:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - none of the articles look like they will ever be worth expanding. Looks like towercruft to me. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 04:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete the articles for now, but leave the towers in lists. --Ineffable3000 05:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom. MER-C 07:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete all, just a bunch of non-notable TV towers. Not that a major tower, with no sources cited. Terence Ong 12:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom, many of those turn up at list of towers in red, and then immediately get these oneliner articles Arnoutf 21:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete all, what useful information there is can be in the lists. --Sable232 15:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete all, unless notable landmarks in their own right in their area - e.g referenced in local media etc, there seems no point in the data. List would be fine without the articles Dick G 15:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep all, I think all these towers are notable enough to have stub status in an encyclopedia.--Natl1 22:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete all per above and past discussions. Vegaswikian 09:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.