Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T-kernel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] T-kernel

Creator of subject created article. Violates WP:SPAM, WP:OR, and WP:VAIN.03:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dlohcierekim (talk • contribs) 04:50, 10 August 2006.

AfD not properly linked on article page - now fixed LinaMishima 04:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Comment-- thanks, LinaMishima. I'm not sure why it was such a struggle to get this listed. Could the links in the template I dropped be defective? Thanks for signing me. :) Dlohcierekim 14:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Whilst I personally think that this subject may warrant a reference quest, and it is certainly verifiable (it was presented at an academic conference), I strongly believe in setting an example against vanity. Whilst the content could be expanded in a usefull manner, to leave this would set a horrible example to vain people everywhere. LinaMishima 04:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: SoSP is the most exclusive conference on operating systems. It's quite difficult to get a paper into it. On the other hand, there's no way to know whether this will have staying power. Gazpacho 04:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Reply to comment After sleep, I might try to track down the paper. The paper itself may reveal more about it's worth to be in wikipedia. Suspect it would be better used on an Operating Systems theory page as a reference, rather than as it's own article - most academic OSes see little real world use or notariety. LinaMishima 05:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, I've decided this can wait until the paper gets a few citations. Gazpacho 05:23, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Waiting to determine if paper citation is a hoax, sufficient notability, or not, but right now it's vanispamcruftisement. Morgan Wick 05:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as is describes an OS from a one page paper that accompanies a poster in the SOPS poster session. The paper itself says little more than what the wikipedia article says, although the authors are working on a more elaborate paper [1]. Moreover, since we're talking about a SOPS paper from 2005 you would at least expect some citations to show up in google scholar. However, although the paper is there (when you search for Gu and Stankovic) there a no citations at all. Actually, also with google sec I'm unable to find any other papers that cite this one. Hence, in my book WP:VAIN applies. -- Koffieyahoo 08:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Koffieyahoo. Mr Stephen 08:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.