Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Systematic approach

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result wasspeedy deleted as a copyvio and (even with permission) pretty much contextless etc. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 12:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Systematic approach

There are two problems here:

1. Possible copyvio, though author claims permission. This can be overcome, but why, when.....
2. This reads like an essay, is contextless, and totally unencyclopedic. (|-- UlTiMuS 09:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, per nom, and was deleted (speedy, I think) before as copyvio. Even with permission, this is unencyclopedic and matches WP:NOT quite good. Fram 09:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

• Indeed, it's been speedied three times in a row. I'd like to get this thing over with once and for all, though, since the author has qualms with the CV deletions. (|-- UlTiMuS 09:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - utterly without context or anything else particularly useful. BigHaz 10:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia articles are not essays and don't use the word "we". - Mgm|^(talk) 11:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - it is an essay, and it appears to be an attempt to ge the name of the company included in a wikipedia article. -- Whpq 16:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete meaningless text so far. True, a buzzword, but original research of a nonnotable website and a shameless promo. `'mikka (t) 17:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 19:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete yet again and protect from re-creation per CSD-G4 and CSD-A8 as a repost and a recent copyvio of this page. It's been speedied three times, and it's still a copy/paste job from the website. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 06:49, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.