Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synods in the Church of England.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:36, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Synods in the Church of England.

Largely redundant with article Synod when it was created; now totally redundant, as I've just merged the remaining sentence. There was apparently talk of expanding this article several months ago, but if anyone has anything encyclopedic to say about Anglican synods in particular that can't go at Synod or Church of England, I encourage them to create a new page without the "." at the end. --Quuxplusone 00:32, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete (nominator's vote) --Quuxplusone 00:32, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to synod would be better than delete I think. Batmanand 00:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to synod since the "other part" of merge has already been done. -Jcbarr 00:41, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• delete no reason for redirect from new, nonsearchable title (with dot, too). mikka (t) 00:55, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not likely to be searched for Prodego ^talk 01:02, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per Prodego. jareha 01:17, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Do we need to look at House of Bishops as well? Regards, Ben Aveling 01:30, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Prodego. Royboycrashfan 03:07, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Prodego. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 05:17, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Adrian Lamo · (talk) · (mail) · 07:39, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete since we're here, but even with the '.' it would have been a harmless redirect, saving this debate. --Doc ^ask? 09:07, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete As per Doc. (Opes 21:37, 1 February 2006 (UTC))
• Delete per nom. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 21:41, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 02:00, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- Minimal and probably redundant content, and malformed article name. Haikupoet 03:49, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.