Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Symphoniq Corporation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Symphoniq Corporation

Spam for non-notable corporation --Xrblsnggt 06:27, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. as advertisement, article was originally written by a company employee, who in an edit summary of Symphoniq TrueView admitted that the article was a "Brief summary of my company's product." Due to the fact that it was added by a complany employee and it's low notabality, I've prodded Symphoniq TrueView as well. tmopkisn ^tlka 06:59, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. 155 distinct Ghits on firm, mostly their own white papers and vendor listings. No third-party multiple non-trivial articles. Confirmed admission article written by an employee (for future reference, on the page history for Symphoniq TrueView). parenthetically, there's no prod indication on the Trueview article at the moment. Tychocat 07:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Heh, whoops, sometimes I say I'm going to do something, but never get around to it. ANyway, it's there now. tmopkisn ^tlka 09:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.