Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stoner burrito

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Non-notable, cookbookish and drug-culture-related, Wikipedia is none of these. -[[User:Mysekurity|Mysekurity]] ^{[[additions | e-mail]]} _{05:44, 8 November 2005 (UTC)}

[edit] Stoner burrito

Wikipedia is not a cookbook.keepsleeping say what 03:12, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

• Keep it doesn't look like a cookbook entry to me. CarDepot 03:17, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• keep, not a recipe. Kappa 03:32, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - WTF? Concept with ONE Google hit, completely unverifiable and unencyclopedic. I can't believe the keep votes here. Absurd. FCYTravis 03:49, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the personal attack. No-one mentioned verifiability. Kappa 04:44, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
    • It's not a personal attack to say a keep vote is absurd. I see people's delete votes on such things as schools called the likes of "absurd" all the time. FCYTravis 04:56, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per FCYTravis unverifiable --JAranda | watz sup 03:53, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• I would vote to keep this if it were verifiable. However, a Google search for "Stoner burrito" gets a solitary result see [1]. A Google search for "Frito pie burrito" does better although none of the results seemed particularly definitive see [2]. The problems with WP:V for this article will lead me to vote Deletewhile noting that, if kept, it should be moved to "Frito pie burrito". A Google print search for Frito pie burrito" came up empty swinging my vote towards delete. Capitalistroadster 04:50, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Come on now, I mean for real! What the hell are you all talking about a Stoner Burrito? You know up here in the northern part of the U.S. certain individuals will act out violently upon hearing such terminology. I mean after all the 1960s was the era of Civil Rights Activism. I know it was mainly just for women and blacks. But what about the hispanic/Latino culture?

Go ahead and walk into any of America's numerous ghettos or certains other parts of the inner city and call the first person you see that you can classify as a hispanic/Latino a "Stoner burrito" and see what happens!!! I bet you dollars to doughnuts that you will not like what you see, not to mention the fact that you will be extremely lucky if you don't happen to see the glint of a steel blade being exposed or tearing at your skin for such a rude racist comment.

This says a lot comming from a white guy who used to be a racist and knows all different sorts of phrases from back in the day, if you know what I mean.

• Delete Echoes aforementioned reasons. Upled
• Delete. Proto t c 12:34, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete completely unverifiable jnothman ^talk 14:43, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unverifiable nonsense. —Morven 19:29, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Disgusting article. Garr 23:57, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.