Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Chappell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:04, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Steve Chappell

Textbook -- and aggressive -- vanity bio. Precious few Google hits, Web, News, or Groups. Calton | Talk 02:36, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Vanity bio as per nom. — CRAZY`(IN)`SANE 02:41, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete vanity bio.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! 02:50, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, and for the even worse sin of superfluous quotes --Deville (Talk) 03:35, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator. JIP | Talk 05:59, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per WP:Vanity and WP:NN. SorryGuy 06:34, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable and with few google hits. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 09:49, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity and nn. --Terence Ong 12:26, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom as 'caveman' vanity. --Lockley 15:53, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Dileete. You would think that a businessman writing a vanity bio would at least spell the damn thing properly. RGTraynor 16:31, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity - badly-written vanity, at that. --MarcoTolo 16:32, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Conditional Keep. The fact that its badly written does not determine whether or not its a vanity page whatsoever. If it is in fact badly written, then it is simply a page that is in need of attention. His personal activities might be important information on Wikipedia and they seem to have been aspirations that have been realised. There's a Steve Chappell here who has wrote a well known book on DIY, whether it is the same one or not I do not know. He seems to have wrote several articles for a quarterly here too: [1] If it isn't the same guy though I'd probably ditch it. --Knucmo2 18:15, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment I don't think they're the same guy. I see nothing to link this guy (who seems like a relatively unknown computer type) with Steve K Chappell, a widely published expert on how to build log and timber houses. Actually, the second guy looks more interesting. Fan1967 02:09, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.