Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefan Daniels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  00:55, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stefan_Daniels

Delete: Subject no longer noteworthy die Baumfabrik 02:14, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, but I don't think he ever really was all that noteworthy, maybe worth a mention in an article on independant wineries. Gotta feel for the guy, having his ISP display his bankruptcy notice. :) -Dawson 02:27, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Were they ever notable? Notability doesn't really go away imho, but Google has nothing on this name. — Adrian Lamo ·· 02:31, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no assertion of notability. Royboycrashfan 02:55, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:18, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete; I agree with Adrian, but this article offers nothing. Melchoir 08:36, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete notability doesn't go away, but he never had it. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 09:03, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn. --Terence Ong 09:18, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, non-notable wine maker --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 13:14, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per everybody else. --AaronS 18:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, same reasons as everybody else. --Chachu207 19:33, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.