Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Wreck 4½: Weak Performance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep in some form - considerable consensus for merging, but as that would require a different article structure I haven't attempted it myself. Merge tags added. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 12:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Star Wreck 4½: Weak Performance

• Delete. Star Trek fancruft. — WCityMike ^(T | C)  ⇓ plz reply HERE  (why?) ⇓  02:50, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - please see my comments about Star Wreck (link to AFD)- there are plenty of mainstream media articles about this series, including CNN. [1] It's unquestionably notable. BigDT 03:18, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Star Wreck, if that one survives the AFD. Otherwise, delete. JRP 03:28, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable, not encyclopedic, even if it was on CNN. CNN runs 24 hours a day, and they have to fill time somehow. Erik the Rude 03:43, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Ummm ... yeah. One suggestion -you may want to take a look at Wikipedia:Guide to deletion and Wikipedia:Deletion policy to gain a little background on this process. BigDT 04:05, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
    • I'm well aware of the policies relating to the deletion process. Don't patronize me. Erik the Rude 04:20, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, notable movie. JIP | Talk 08:39, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Star Wreck. -- GWO
• Merge with Star Wreck and Delete. They made this as a small test before making another film? So utterly not-notable. - Motor (talk) 10:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per DT. --badlydrawnjeff talk 11:25, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Star Wreck. "In the Pirkinning" is currently the only film in the series that merits a separate article. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 12:01, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. SJennings 14:38, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Star Wreck (or delete if Star Wreck does not survive it's own AfD).--Isotope23 14:45, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge or delete per Isotope23 . — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 18:21, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Star Wreck. Only Star Wreck: In the Pirkinning is notable enough for its own article. -- Hawaiian717 19:18, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Merge into Star Wreck. Not notable enough for own article Bwithh 23:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete+Merge Star Wreck may be notable, BigDT, but a small little test movie for it is NOT. Really, only episodes for major TV series should ever see the light of a separate article, and even then.... fancruft. Kevin_b_er 04:15, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Star Wreck per abovePunainen Nörtti 09:02, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per same reasoning as Star Wreck would be kept - real media mentions, quite well known in Finland and elsewhere. Though I have to say that I'm on a bit more vague grounds here; this definitely wasn't the high point of the series and certainly not the most popular and well-made one. At worst, this is Mergeable material. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 16:43, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Star Wreck, does not need an article of its own per Ilmari Karonen. Kusma (討論) 00:49, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.