Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Trek The Beginning
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was AFD request unnecessary, speedily closed, page redirected as below. -- Soir (say hi) 02:56, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Star Trek The Beginning
Highly speculative, crystal ball. First draft scripts are too speculative - neither the title nor even a production date has been established and the article itself says this. Copied from Star Trek where this is already covered. Attempt by another user to change this to a redirect to the main article just resulted in a revert by the page creator, so I started the VFD 23skidoo 01:19, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy redirect, but I don't think AFD is the way to handle this. But just in case this sticks: Page is copied minus wikimarup from Star Trek, as well as copyvio from the link provided at the bottom. -- Soir (say hi) 01:37, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
- If someone wants to drop a copyvio notice there instead, I have no objection. AFD/VFD isn't the best option, however the creator of this page has already reverted one redirect and also blanked the copyvio notice at Star Trek 11 (which was essentially the same as this article) so I felt this was a better way to go than to risk a revert war. 23skidoo 01:40, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
- Copyvio notices are for pages where there is no prior page to revert to. All I'd have to do is leave the top half in, that's still at least GFDL, even if redundant. I just don't see the need to wait a week to resolve when we can seek admin attention. I won't revert again if he does, though. :) -- Soir (say hi) 01:50, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
- If someone wants to drop a copyvio notice there instead, I have no objection. AFD/VFD isn't the best option, however the creator of this page has already reverted one redirect and also blanked the copyvio notice at Star Trek 11 (which was essentially the same as this article) so I felt this was a better way to go than to risk a revert war. 23skidoo 01:40, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. Original page was not reverted from redirect, so there's no need for this proposal to be here. Closing. -- Soir (say hi) 02:56, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.