Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Trek: Reborn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Star Trek: Reborn
Non-notable fan fiction. (Not a fan series like New Voyages, but just scripts/stories) Mnemeson 13:45, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per our mini discussion at the project and for being non-notable, while i dont doubt that they produce good stories they just are not notable enough for wikipedia. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 13:53, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --EEMeltonIV 14:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. The unwritten rule is to keep all Trek. Billy Blythe 15:09, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- And the written rule is this is fancruft. Delete Danny Lilithborne 16:33, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and thanks for explaining what this was. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:33, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Eusebeus 16:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable fanfic. Google search on ("Star Trek: Reborn" +virtual) brings up only 86 returns, 35 unique. Modifier added to search to filter out news stories on the new feature film, many of which use the phrase "Star Trek Reborn". MikeWazowski 18:28, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. People Powered 22:11, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable fanfic. I doubt this would fly even at Memory Alpha. --Calton | Talk 07:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.