Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Michael's RCIA Podcast
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. No evidience of notability, and stated readership is too small even if verified. Happy to userify this article to Cav if requested to do so. --++Lar: t/c 13:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] St. Michael's RCIA Podcast
Non-notable podcast. cholmes75 (chit chat) 13:51, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Falls under WP:NOT, promotion. Yanksox 13:54, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, podcast with no evidence of wide listenership or downloads that would make it more than just an average podcast.--Isotope23 15:33, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry you feel that way. Maybe 40-60 listeners a week isn't noteworthy enough for the Wiki community. But maybe one day it will be. So if this is such a big thorn in everyone's side, then go ahead and delete it. --Cav 23:43, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Generally speaking, 40-60 listeners a week would probably not be considered notworthy enough for inclusion. Please don't take it personally. If this article does get deleted and at a future date this podcast gains popularity/has a large listener base, you could always recreate the article.--Isotope23 12:35, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. I would only consider a podcast notable if it had thousands of listeners and was covered in notable media somewhere. Aguerriero (talk) 20:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Duly noted. I have saved my format to notepad, and perhaps someday, if listenership grows, I will addit again. Feel free to Delete, and sorry for my tone yesterday.
- Don't sweat it; It's never really easy to see the article you've created be nominated for deletion... besides what you seem to feel was a negative tone was about 100x more civil than the way alot of people deal with it. Good luck with your podcast!--Isotope23 17:47, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, I took no offense, you were pretty civil when you consider how grusome this process is. It's hard seeing your baby asphyxiated in the twilight of the night by a bunch of strangers. Yanksox 17:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Don't sweat it; It's never really easy to see the article you've created be nominated for deletion... besides what you seem to feel was a negative tone was about 100x more civil than the way alot of people deal with it. Good luck with your podcast!--Isotope23 17:47, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Duly noted. I have saved my format to notepad, and perhaps someday, if listenership grows, I will addit again. Feel free to Delete, and sorry for my tone yesterday.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.