Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squeezethroughable

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was squeeze through the gaps in the database delete. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 00:35, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Squeezethroughable

WP:NFT. Needless to say this word has 0 Google hits. Punkmorten 08:21, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

• Total Garbage. Delete expediantly.Tombride 09:01, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP is not a dictionary, WP is not for things made up in school one day.  (aeropagitica)  09:46, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Nonsense. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 10:05, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete patent nonsense. Bucketsofg 16:05, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not a dictionary of made-up words either. -- Mithent 02:46, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 07:01, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nonsense. --Terence Ong 09:55, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.