Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spinoza Ray Prozak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete.  Denelson83  22:03, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Spinoza Ray Prozak

American Nihilist Underground Society has been repeatedly deleted, why should the article about the nn organization's nn founder be kept? User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:27, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

If my apartment complex Waterview Park, a complex (that hardly anyone knows or cares about) with at most, a few thousand students in a small local suburban area, can have an article, then an organization that receives hundreds of thousands of hits per month and many thousands of registered fourms users should be able to have an article too. Anything less than this is pure utter blatant hypocrisy on the part of Wikipedia admins and delete voters. 129.110.192.84 05:07, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Please feel free to AfD Waterview Park; it doesn't look encyclopedic. --moof 12:53, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

You don't get it. I dont think either should be deleted. Its the hypocrisy I have an attitude with. If you support deleting this article, then you better delete that one too. Otherwise, you're being a hypocrite (and an ideologue) by supporting a VfD for one article cuz you don't agree with its views or whatever caused you to all of the sudden have double standards. 129.110.192.84 14:26, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Funny you should say that. We're not going to delete that article, because it doesn't exist any more: I just took the time to merge it into the article on the university, where the information belongs. Do you think you could mention any other examples of unsuitable articles you have to hand, so we can fix those too? — Haeleth Talk

Also, note that I find it funny that all articles like this get VfD'd right away while I see all sorts of crap on wikipedia that rarely gets a glancing look at it. In fact I've seen some pretty ridiculous vandalism that took a while to get caught because the subject matter was "approvable" by you guys so you did not give it much of a look while stuff like this barely makes it a day and you all are on top of it whining, complaining, and spewing out all sorts of hypocritical intellectual sophistry. 129.110.192.84 14:32, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

New articles are especially visible, since there's a constantly-updating list of them that a lot of people monitor. You're right that there's a problem with articles making it past initial scrutiny that shouldn't, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't delete the ones we do catch. — Haeleth Talk

• Delete - articles appears POV and seems only to bash at ANUS. Also reasonably nn - nevertheless that's not my reason to vote for deletion. Spearhead 15:09, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - I, as a Homosexual African-American of partial Ashkenazim ancestry and of the Jewish profession, am morally offended at this bigot's page. We cannot allow maligners to infiltrate wikipedia, especially when wikipedia is planning on publishing and distributing articles for use in third world countries that don't even have the abilities to feed themselves. Humbug, I say! Humbug! --Iconoclast 15:13, 11 November 2005 (UTC)--Iconoclast 15:13, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete troll vanity. I've never even heard of this "ANUS" organisation; they're clearly not a big and well-known groups like the GNAA. Oh, and don't forget to delete the picture while you're at it. — Haeleth Talk 18:02, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

I agree with you. If you haven't heard of a group before, then they're probably not notable. I'll use this maxim in the future when deciding what is notable and not. --Iconoclast 19:27, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. → Ξxtreme Unction {yak yak yak ł blah blah blah} 20:16, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: Dream the dreams, envision the visions, but don't advertise on Wikipedia or expect encyclopedias to do your work for you. Achieve, and then the reference works will follow. Geogre 22:44, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep: Information about ANUS.com is encyclopaedic.
• Keep: Prozak is a legend to everyone. Would you delete Rosa Parks from Wikipedia? 24.129.210.35
• Delete immediately and protect the deleted page. Hall Monitor 23:41, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete immediately and remove the deleted page. Obviously POV and bashing slander without veracity. Firecross 20:18, 12 November 2005
• Speedy delete this is racially offensive and unencyclopedic nonsense. Yamaguchi先生 08:00, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep Yamaguchi?? is being racially offensive to wikipedia users. speedy delete for him. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.187.248.26 (talk • contribs).
• Delete. Non-notable, unencyclopedic. *drew 02:59, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.