Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southwick United F.C.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:52, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Southwick United F.C.
I don't get a single Ghit for 'Rimla Cola League' and it is not in the English football league system. A hopeless failure to meet WP:CORP - English men's football clubs competing in Levels 1-10 of the English football league system are considered inherently notable. and no independent notability unless those crumpets are very, very good! Delete. BlueValour 02:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete This may surprise a few Wikipedians, but this article has to be deleted for a number of reasons. Try as I might, the main problem here is a complete lack of Verifiability. On top of that, this club is not even a part of the English football league system (correct me if I am wrong about this). The only reliable information I have about this club is that it will be competing in the Sussex Sunday Challenge Cup on Oct 1 2006! The webpage of this information is here: Sussex Website Because of these reasons, I cannot even verify if the club was established in 2005 or part of Rimla Cola League. If one can give me verifiable sources of this club, I will gladly change my stand. But for the present, this article should be deleted. --Siva1979Talk to me 02:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Alias Flood 03:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Does not appear to be a club playing at, or having played at, a sufficient level for which notability could be claimed or verified. -- Alias Flood 03:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:V and per Siva1979. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 06:44, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - It sounds like it's a Sunday league team, none of which are notable. --Balerion 05:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Siva1979's great explanation, unverifiable. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 07:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per Siva1979 and WP:CORP. Qwghlm 07:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Ramsquire 19:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 13:06, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - this club is highly non-notable assuming it even exists ChrisTheDude 13:07, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- Not notable, so delete. FairHair 17:20, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.