Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soul Calibur III (tiers)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was a clear delete, but I'm baffled as to how it could ever be considered a speedy candidate. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 03:34, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Soul Calibur III (tiers)

"Subject to debate" indeed. This article cannot hope to be anything but pure opinion, and is completely unsourced. In the unlikely chance that the opinions here could be sourced to noteworthy holders commenting in reliable sources, it would still be game-guide-style how-to despite the lack of imperative tone and thus inappropriate to Wikipedia. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 18:53, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. "The tier rankings for Soul Calibur III are subject to debate." Blatantly POV. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:34, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. Certainly no reason for this to be here. -Zero^Talk 19:54, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep. While they may be debated upon, tiers in fighting games are generally agreed upon and held as fact. -Spiffy42 20:02, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • And they are appropriate to Wikipedia and not instructive game-guide material, how? - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 20:17, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Pure Opinion. This is not factual at all. If anything, It's misleading. Delete it. - User:tog5632
• Delete. No context and confusing POV soapbox content fork. Wikipedia is not the place to debate the tier rankings for Soul Calibur III. -- Krash (Talk) 02:42, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.