Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sosa gliding club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete as copyvio. Deathphoenix ʕ 01:48, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sosa gliding club

Tagged for speedy as nn-club, but notability clearly asserted; I can't offhand think of the applicable guidelines and can't make up my mind whether this claim to notability is encyclopaedic or not. A gliding club of 150 members - is that big for a gliding club? If it was, would it make it important? Can't decide. Just zis Guy you know? 11:02, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

• Weak keep. I agree this is a tough one. I note that the article claims that Sosa is the oldest in Canada, which is (I suppose) notability of a kind. My tendency is to allow the borderline cases to stay (wikipedia is not paper). Bucketsofg✐ 13:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Agree with Bucketsofg on this one. Maybe stick a {{wikify}} tag on, too. -- MarcoTolo 20:56, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

• Change to Delete per ReyBrujo (as copyvio). -- MarcoTolo 02:59, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Agree with the above, perhaps edited a bit for POV. --Eyaw Nayr 21:18, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, although it seems notable, it is a copyvio [1] -- ReyBrujo 02:49, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per ReyBrujo. Ardenn 17:41, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• It's a partial copyvio. Delete as barely notable club, but if kept, clip the copyvio parts. Stifle (talk) 23:54, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as not notable enough. --Arny 18:02, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete possibly a marginal case. Runcorn 16:30, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

• Weak delete, if any gliding club were notable, this one probably would be, but I don't think that such clubs are notable. -- Kjkolb 09:00, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. It's a notable sports club in Canada. What's the problem with keeping it? If someone has identified a copyvio, why not get stuck in and edit? Markb 13:08, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete; copyvio -- getcrunkjuice^contribs 22:42, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.