Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sororialmon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was moot - speedy deleted. Mailer Diablo 01:08, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sororialmon

Cannot find any evidence to support the official existance of this Digimon: it is not in the Digimon Visual Dictionary which covers all cards up to 2002 and is not on any of the cards released since as far as I can verify. Google search only returns pages on wikipedia; even if it was misspelt, there would be a source somewhere for the misspelling. Shiroi Hane 00:01, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

The following unsourced articles were also all created by the same user, Macdaddyc, around the same time:

• Basiliskmon
• Tailiomon
• Sandermon

The only one I that returns any results on Google is Basiliskmon, and they all seem to be fanfiction (which is understandable, since it is an obvious name). Shiroi Hane 00:32, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete all as obvious hoaxes. Circeus 01:30, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete doesn't meet standards. ---|Newyorktimescrossword 02:34, 8 May 2006 (UTC)|
• Delete all Hoaxes. -- Ned Scott 05:25, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all individual Digimon articles, hoax or not, unless they are particularly notable. I'm aware we keep Pokémon, but that has many times the fan base of Digimon. Stifle (talk) 11:44, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Per WP:BOLD, I've deleted all four hoaxes. —Nightstallion (?) ^{Seen this already?} 12:48, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.