Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophia Michahelles

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep · Katefan0^(scribble) 21:31, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sophia Michahelles

Good Article but it is a nn puppetier Delete sry Keep with expansion Before it just showed she was only a puppetier in some festival but now it was expanded --Aranda56 03:19, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

Comment from author: Thanks for the compliment "Good Article." I do have additional material I will add which will perhaps better establish her place in the community of her peers... I'm curious: What does a puppeteer have to do to be notable? Do give me a day or two, okay? Kind regards.  :-) paul klenk 03:35, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

Additional comment: Have added her off-Broadway work; her association with the (Jim) Henson Festival; her work commissioned by the Sci-Fi channel; her credits as an instructor in her field; and more about her work in Italy. Photo GFDL license requests are pending from the National Geographic Society, which has featured her work. Will contact nominator Aranda56 to see if this merits removal from the deletion log. My apologies for not getting more of this material in earlier -- and "thanks" to my fellow editor for pushing me to get off my butt and get some real work done!!!! paul klenk

• Keep. Good article by user Paul Klenk and the subject is notable enough for mine given association with the Henson Festival, New York's Village Halloween Parade and the Sci-Fi Festival. Capitalistroadster 05:42, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - Notability is sufficiently asserted in my opinion --Camw 06:14, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Camw. --Apyule 07:42, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Capitalistroadster. --fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 07:43, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I have no problem with this article. Alf ^melmac 09:22, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep expanded version. Now shows enough notability to justify inclusion. Barno 15:35, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as the article has been expanded. Hall Monitor 19:03, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, I see nothing wrong with this article. Shauri 20:03, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.