Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonnett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Sonnet. -- ( drini's _vandalproof page ☎ ) 06:09, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sonnett

Non-notable english rock band, can't find them on google and are listed as "little known" in this article.jfg284 ^{you were saying?} 13:33, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nomjfg284 ^{you were saying?} 13:33, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

I'll agree with a redirect, at first i thought maybe someone has vandalised the sonnet page, then realized that I had found the article under new pages, so it had to have been newly created and not just a total page blank/rewrite. In any case, both sonet and sonett already have pages... the former is a disambig, so i just added a line about a misspelled version of "sonnet," and the latter redirects to Saab Sonett. Should someone place a disambig type heading like This is an article on an automobile. For the poetic form "sonnet," click here? I think it'd be helpful, following the same logic that double letter mixups are easy. Thoughts?jfg284 ^{you were saying?} 16:38, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, article even acknowledges band is little known. UkPaolo 13:45, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

+redirect per Last Malthusian. UkPaolo 16:09, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

• A redirect to sonnet would seem in order. Double letter mix-ups are surely the commonest misspelling there is. --Last Malthusian 15:01, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect per Last Malthusian, with thanks to the band for making our job easier. If only all these NN bands started by saying they were "little known" :-) Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] (W) AfD? 15:47, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect per above. --Syrthiss 15:48, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete NN --Rogerd 03:54, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.