Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonic Hearts: The Hidden Memories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was do not want.--SB | T 02:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sonic Hearts: The Hidden Memories

Non-notable webcomic. 7 Google hits, one of them being the Wikipedia article. Also WP:SPAM, since they are also trying to hire other people to work on the comic through the article. NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 06:19, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Kbja 06:30, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Spamgasmic. 205.157.110.11 08:48, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for the reasons given in the nom. Non notable web comic. Thε Halo ^Θ 15:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Unable to get any sort of Alexa traffic breakdown of the site, since it's bundled into the DeviantArt totals. However, a search of "sonic hearts: the hidden memories" gets only four distinct Ghits out of seven total: Two of these are DeviantArt forums, one is WP, and the fourth is a blog. Fails WP:WEB for lacking multiple non-trivial third-party articles, no major awards. Points for being on the DeviantArt site, but I cannot say this overrides the spam, self-promotion, and near-complete lack of notability of the comic. Tychocat 15:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

• I say DON'T DELETE THIS PAGE! -sonicmaster1223
  • Comment ..why not? The comic isn't notable, and the article is spam to boot. —NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 21:15, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Spamtastic. I can certainley draw better then that. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 21:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For your information, that is a image made on the computer! And besides, I am not trying to make spam! So buzz off!-Sonicmaster1223
    • Comment Under Wikipedia's rules about spam, solicting for new members to work on your comic is in a way, spam. Additionally, what does the image being made on a computer have to do anything? It doesn't make the comic any more notable. Nevermind, you were responding to Matthew Fenton's comments. And finally, sign your comments with the symbols ~~~~ rather than just leaving your name. —NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 17:29, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Excerpt from the page This is something I whipped together. It's some cartoon characters on a real life Japanese image.. This suggests the whole thing not noteable enough to be on wikipedia WP:NOTABILITY. Site not recognised by any 3rd party, no awards, no commercial productions etc. Also possibly violation of WP:VANITY. The article does not really appear to be malicious spam. In general, userpages of web communities are not noteable at all. Use Webhosting. User:Yy-bo

• Delete. Non notable, and a pretty sizable amount of work simply taken from other sources (borrowed/stolen characters depending on your views). Much more worthy comics have gone unmentioned, why mention a relatively worthless one? Also tons of spam and shameless self promotion. I hate to admit it, but this is even worse than the furry fandom article. -Anonymous

• Delete. Shameless self-promotion and vanity article. -- Viewdrix 00:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Self-promotion of a non-notable, amateurish comic. Completely worthless.

• Delete. It's a non notable webcomic which actually steals art and uses it for it's own reasons. The amount of detail to go into the page also suggests it's a Vanity article. EvilJelly

• Delete. This is so absolutely terrible, worthless, and non-notable. --Midnyt 01:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. If more notable Internet-related phenomena and "memes" have no place on Wikipedia, this certainly does not. It is a startup webcomic that has no place in an encyclopedia. 24.163.43.98 01:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.