Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solkope

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. There are some voices to merge this, but that discussion I will leave to the talkpage. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:44, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Solkope

Island is of low noteablity and is being used for the sole purpose of promoting DOM.Davidpdx 02:24, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

• A real island with real associated mythology and features (research turns up Gordon MacGregor's notes on tamura and the tupua' Leplafeke). Keep. Uncle G 02:42, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete-per nomination Davidpdx 04:31, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep since it is a real island. The DOM stuff on Wikipedia needs some serious work, though. -- Kjkolb 06:14, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep: as it is only a stub and noteworthy from the news media's references to it, etc. I hope that Kjkolb helps with the DOM article.Johnski 06:18, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand of island of some notability as per Uncle G. Capitalistroadster 06:25, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I did a quick rewrite. Not really all that much you can say about an unihabited island that is "claimed" by a fraudulent micronation... I did add the association to the parent island of Rotuma though.--Isotope23 14:48, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
• KeepLogophile 15:50, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep A named island seems a straight forward keep. Marskell 10:18, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
• Merging with Rotuma seems called for; but this does not require AfD. Septentrionalis 16:28, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep but remove the irrelevant DOM part. Pavel Vozenilek 16:59, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with Rotuma as it is a real island but of minor importance Shocktm (Talk * Contributions) 20:31, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - and expand with the DOM "claim". --Cactus.man ✍ 05:39, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete How many quaint little spots with a trivial local legend are there?Dejvid 18:37, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
• Template:Votedelete: Not enough material. Myth could be in an article about the lore tellers or where they live, rather than the little rock. (SEWilco 03:31, 25 October 2005 (UTC))

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.