Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sofía Álvarez Vignoli de Demichelli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Nom withdrew. SynergeticMaggot 06:15, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sofía Álvarez Vignoli de Demichelli

She seems non-notable. There are only two mentions of her in the one external link on the article, and I can't really find anything else about her. —Mets501 (talk) 01:34, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Article has been significantly expanded, now she seems notable enough. I change my vote to Keep. —Mets501 (talk) 00:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

• Expand Seems like a genuine article to me. But unverifiable because of her low profile and the status of Uruguay in those years. --Ageo020 02:16, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • There's no doubt that it's genuine. I just don't think she's notable, and being unverifiable doesn't help. —Mets501 (talk) 02:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and Expand, I'll go with the expand but I could be convinced otherwise. The linked article mentions that she represented Uruguay in the Interamerican Women's Conference. My guess would be that her status in the women's movement is comparable to some of the lesser-known American sufferage activists, of whom I am sure we have articles aplenty. -- Deville (Talk) 03:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Associations with notable people don't confer notability. wikipediatrix 15:08, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect — To Alberto Demichelli - all of the info in this article is already in that one. Failing this, it should be expanded hugely. Martinp23 20:12, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep We're seriously considering keeping the cat of a daughter of an ex-president Misty Malarky Ying Yang while proposing deleting the diplomat wife of another? I'll expand it a bit. Dlyons493 Talk 21:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

OK - it's in better shape now. I might do a little more, but I think there are plenty valid claims to notability. Dlyons493 Talk 23:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - good save, folks. humblefool® 01:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep nonimator now wants to keep article. --Edgelord 03:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.