Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social Engine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 09:01, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Social Engine

Non-notable "literary writing" [sic], with zero Google results [1]. The one included "source" is a link to a copy of "The Social Engine", showing it to be a total of four paragraphs in length. --PeruvianLlama^(spit) 05:49, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Wikipedia should not include original research per Wikipedia:No original research. Unless the said reference has been peer reviewed /reported in well respected source, the article should be deleted. --Hurricane111 05:51, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - This is some kind of unpublished new-agey self-help thing. Endomion 06:16, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Or an English class essay (although it doesn't follow the five-paragraph pattern) -- Dalbury^(Talk) 12:16, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unsourced implies unsourcable. People do need to be careful inorder to not get deleted.Lotusduck 07:15, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.