Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snob fiction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. DS 14:26, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Snob fiction

Non-notable, possible nonsense. Google search is misleading. (Results showed 708,000 for Snob fiction but only 4 on what the article is about; and those links are the wikipedia article itself, answers.com (mirror of WP) and a page that isn't written in English).

Here is what the article (that wasn't written in english translated to:

I must greet here the birth of a new literary movement, 
certainly still confidential, 
launched by my pupil 
and friendly P. Jourdan: 
the SNOB FICTION. 

Here the funny article and scholar who refers to it in Wikipedia: 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snob_fiction 

Keep writing... 

Trying to keep this short, it looks like a hoax. Moe ε 02:06, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, hoax. Royboycrashfan 02:11, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for reasons self-evident. Danny Lilithborne 03:15, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete looks like rubbish to me--Light current 03:19, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Metamagician3000 04:38, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, hoax. --Terence Ong 05:08, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-04-09 08:39Z
• Delete, nn, hit snooze bar, roll over, go back to sleep. Haikupoet 02:38, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not even good hoax ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 06:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.