Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slow dancing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 05:07, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Slow dancing

Delete content-free dicdef ("Slow dancing is when a couple dance slowly"?) At best might be transwikied to Wiktionary. Was speedied, then prod'ed, each time the original editor removed the notice without comment Gwernol 01:28, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

• • Keep** This is a good term. Anyway, it says if you disagree with the delete, you may remove this message on the notice - so I did. Keep. April 21
• Delete as per. Rklawton 02:30, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and add clean-up and stub tags: I am tempted to say delete because the content is so limited. But the concept of slow dancing has so much cultural relevance -- coming of age, songs, movies, etc. This could be a really worthwhile discussion of the ways in which slow dancing is a significant act in our society. At the same time, there is something borderline absurd about the article as it stands, so I wouldn't cry if it were to be deleted. Quepasahombre 02:46, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and add clean-up and stub tags as above. Jesustrashcan 15:10, 17 April 2006
• Keep and add clean-up and stub tags as this is a legitimate form of dancing, just that this article needs some real cleaning up. :: Colin Keigher 05:46, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup, seems like a notable topic needs much more expansion. --Terence Ong 10:40, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, and hope it will get expanded later. I doubt Wikt would keep this. But then again, maybe it would. I'll ask them. --Dangherous 12:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep unfortunately, b/c article is probably destined to be a one-line stub. - the.crazy.russian τ ç ë 19:08, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and clean Jordanmills 22:13, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep and expand. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 22:33, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I've expanded it a tiny bit with completely unsourced information from my head. If anyone challenges the information I added, they should of course delete it, but even then I'd support keeping the article. References for this have got to be out there somewhere. --Allen 22:44, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• """Keep""" why would you delete

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.