Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skullet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Merging it to Mullet (haircut) as an editorial decision. - Bobet 14:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Skullet

A neologism: a skullet is like a mullet but bald on top. Tagged for merge, but without sources not worth merging. The section into which it is proposed to be merged is also unsourced. Just zis Guy you know? 10:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Keep, seems to be genuinely used: [1][2][3][4], although the definition in the article is slightly differed from that I found mainly with Google. But that could easily be fixed. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 11:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Google search shows it to be in use. - CheNuevara 12:11, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep as per Reinoutr's comments. Some sources should be cited though. Allisonmontgomery69 15:39, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. As taken from the article, this is a neologism. I am unimpressed by the arguments for documentation in the afd - those should be written into the article. And I will note the article has been only a little expanded from a short undocumented and unverified stub in December, 2005, to its current somewhat longer undocumented and unverified stub. Even with documentation, it is little more than a dicdef, and it's already in the Urban Dictionary. Tychocat 15:51, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: If its a stub, it should be expanded. If its unreferenced, it should be referenced. If it hasn't been edited for a long time, maybe there are few links to the article. Neither of these are reasons to delete. If its just a dicdef, that might be a reason, but the fact that several notable artists are mentioned to have this haircut makes it more than a dicdef. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 16:27, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. --badlydrawnjeff talk 00:53, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge This article should just be merged with the one on Mullet (haircut). Manufracture 16:51, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into Mullet (haircut) - they go well together! BlueValour 01:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge as this is haricut is so closely related to the mullet, and is basically derived off it, that they should be in the one article. Killfest2—Daniel.Bryant 10:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.