Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skills You Can't Teach

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete, nonsense/unsourced/unverifiable protologisms. NawlinWiki 19:57, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Skills You Can't Teach

Textbook case of things made up in school one day. -- Fan-1967 19:17, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete the site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure. Contested prod. VoiceOfReason 19:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:V - can I make a stronger argument? Perhaps, but why bother? That's good enough. WilyD 19:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete per Fan-1967: clear WP:NFT neologism, verging on utter nonsense. Tempting to speedy delete under WP:CSD:G1. Gwernol 19:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete per nom. Erechtheus 19:24, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --  Nishkid64  ^Talk  19:37, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete, thank goodness he didn't create articles for all the other listed protologisms. NawlinWiki 19:38, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

• Nawlin, use your new mighty powers to close the AfD early with a clear consensus! Do it! You know you want to! :) VoiceOfReason 19:49, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

must resist... lure of power.... nahhh. NawlinWiki 19:56, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete -as per nom -- Whpq 19:55, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.