Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ska Punk And Other Junk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ian¹³/t 15:59, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ska Punk And Other Junk

Makes no claims of notability suitable for WP:WEB. Alexa rank of 693,488. Andrew Levine 14:45, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Andrew Levine 14:45, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Why, I Don't Understand?XXXSkaPunk So punknews.org, absolutepunk and other websites get a write up but my site can't? Can you tell me how i can fix it or edit it so it can be published?
    • absolutepunk and punknews are much more notable sites. -- Slowmover 15:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
    • You can fix it by demonstrating that it sastifies one or more of the criteria in WP:WEB, and by following the tips for editors on writing about subjects close to you. Uncle G 16:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- not notable enough to warrant an article. Spylab 14:49, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Spylab
• Delete. They've been online a long time, but failed to achieve real significance, Alexa Rank reflects declining web traffic. No significant ghits either, except linkspam etc. I think with more than half a million more popular websites out there, they fail notability per nom. -- Slowmover 15:15, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep. Site has been around almost a decade -- that's a lifetime by web standards. I'm borderline on this one, but I think this is a WP:GF attempt at a legitimate article. Scorpiondollprincess 15:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:VAIN and WP:WEB WilyD 16:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Vanity and notability are subjective criteria, so many of these vain/nn articles pass through anyway. This article is trash; on the other hand, it is mostly harmless and there's no pressing need to get rid of it.  Cdcon  16:16, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • The article is spam - it is rediculously harmful and there exists a hugely pressing need to set it ablaze. WilyD 16:18, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Notability is not subjective. There are no subjective criteria in WP:WEB. Uncle G 16:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Tychocat 22:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom and Slowmover. Zaxem 09:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No notability established. ~ trialsanderrors 08:19, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.