Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Six paw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:38, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Six paw

neologism, nn. Very few google hits that are not wikipedia mirrors. No links or references. Possibly vanity. At the very least should be merged into furry fandom or similar. Flagongoblin 13:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete or merge into appropriate furry article. 351 Ghits [1], no hits at Gnews [2]. Unsure if it'll pass WP:NEO; if somebody can find a reliable source, I'd be much-obliged. Luna Santin 14:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or redirect to taur, where this sort of thing seems to be already described. JPD (talk) 17:09, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 15:57, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as a non-notable neologism. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 06:21, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Anomo 06:48, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no sources cited. --HResearcher 10:25, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete vanity St.isaac 22:27, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all of the above. —Khoikhoi 00:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.