Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sissy baby
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was MERGE material into infantilism and recast as a redirect. And uh there is no such vote as "Rewrite". You think I got all night here? I merged the material as is into its own section at the bottom of infantilism.Herostratus 04:27, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sissy_baby
Wikipedia already has an article for infantilism. This article appears to be a vanity page for one or more people who identify with this type of paraphilia. The actual term "sissy baby" seems illegitimate, and does not bring any Google results -- it's certainly not relevant for Wikipedia. Grendel 17:09, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- Rewrite It isn't the cleanest it could be I agree. But there are 35 thousand google hits. Check again. Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 17:39, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- Response How many of these results are actually relevant to the topic? As the article stands, it's just a spin-off of infantilism. It would be like having two seperate articles for both "straight" and "heterosexual." At best, I would propose that we delete this article and have "sissy baby" redirect to infantilism. If not, then the article needs to be trunceted down to a simple paragraph explaining what a "sissy baby" is and instead merge it with infantilism. Grendel 17:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- Merge with infantilism after rewrite to give the fetish its proper scope within that topic. Leave a redirect to that article as well. Erechtheus 18:01, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect per erechtheus ST47 19:54, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- Merge/Redirect as per Erechtheus - Alison✍ 17:16, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.